The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has a fascinating, almost chilling, account this week that shows the depths of dissent and deception now roiling in the fields of nutrition research.

The in-depth article documents the orchestrated backlash from a lobby group that tried to intimidate editors at another prominent journal into not publishing a series of scientific papers that found research to date was too weak to find that red meat is a significant health risk.

The article also notes the deliberate breaking of a publication embargo to mount that backlash, which is a serious ethical breach in the research community. The article also exposes the hidden ties to various players in the food industry — on all sides — of nutritional research.

Diet Doctor has often noted that the field of nutrition research is rife with undeclared bias and poor quality research, such as observational studies that don’t establish cause-and-effect relationships.

As noted Stanford researcher Dr. John Ioannadis notes “the whole field is in need of radical reform.

If you ever wanted more evidence of that desperate need for reform, take a look at this almost shocking account of what happened when the Annals of Internal Medicine was about to publish their series of research articles on red meat.

JAMA: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists

 

Guide to red meat

GuideIs red meat healthy or harmful? Should you enjoy it freely on your low-carb, keto diet, or limit your consumption? Depending on which expert you ask, those questions may receive a very different answer. However, has a truly strong link between red meat and heart disease, cancer, or other diseases been established?

 

Earlier

Warnings about processed meat fail the test of science

Does evidence support limiting red meat?
MeatDiet Doctor Podcast #30 – Dr. Gary Fettke55:07Dr. Fettke, along with his wife Belinda, has made it his mission to uncover the truth behind the anti-meat establishment and much of what he has discovered is shocking.Why more protein is better15:17Dr. Ted Naiman is one of the individuals who believes more protein is better and recommends a higher intake. He explains why in this interview.45:29Although it is new in popularity, people have been practicing a carnivore diet for decades, and possibly centuries. Does that mean it is safe and without concern?Diet, health and the environment50:49Dr. Peter Ballerstedt explains how ruminants can be part of the solution to climate change and environmental degradation.Is fear of protein the new fear of fat?35:03Could protein restriction on a low-carb or keto diet cause problems?Is low carb bad for the environment?07:09Won’t low carb contribute to global warming and pollution? Top low-carb doctors answer this question.Can red meat kill you?14:55Where does the fear of red meat come from? And how much meat should we really eat? Science-writer Nina Teicholz answers.What about red meat and health?34:15Does red meat really cause type 2 diabetes, cancer and heart disease?Why you shouldn’t fear protein on keto20:15Do you really need to worry about protein on a ketogenic diet? Dr. Ben Bikman shares a new way of thinking about this.

The post Journal firestorm: JAMA documents orchestrated backlash appeared first on Diet Doctor.

Read more: dietdoctor.com